Notes Manny's agent now says he's still open to a trade, reversing earlier report. Paul
says trade possibilities much better for Tejada, a more positive influence despite
recent events. Comments on recent player/team deals: too many years--an actuary would
never do these deals. On his HOF comments, I'm left again with more evidence that the
procedure has broken down into not much more than a PR vehicle for MLB and every garden
variety baseball writer. Re: closers in HOF, one of this year's debates, he says,
"You can't just use numbers to value closers." AGREED, Paul. Says Lee Smith has the
totals, but was really dominant for a very short time. Says ways to value closers for this award are changing, even in recent years. Paul starts to name recent closers for
whom this debate would apply, then says, "Mariano Rivera is......" BUT CHUCK WILSON
CUTS HIM OFF, WILL NOT LET HIM SAY A WORD ABOUT MARIANO RIVERA. (3 possible reasons he
denied us the expert's timely view: Chuck is very loyal to his friend Dibs, whom he
knows wants Mo to get no publicity; 2nd, Chuck is an anxious on-air host, not good at
give and take, and just blurted at an inappropriate time; 3rd, Chuck, like many others
in the "media" isn't well informed about Mo, couldn't have engaged in any conversation
about him, and wanted to change the subject). Re: JOHN FRANCO: They both agree that
he's not a HOF'er---total saves doesn't get you the award. Ask question: How much
better is a guy than those in his era? Eg., GOSSAGE AND SUTTER MUST BE IN. Ask, what
has he done for the game of baseball? Eg. Did he contribute a special split fingered
fastball or other pitch? Then, Paul White gives the usual line from people who're
uninformed about Mariano Rivera: "A lot of people put emphasis on post season, but
that has nothing to do with it---that just tells about the team." Right, Paul! First,
most media guys' personal agendas don't permit them to look at post season in the
first place. When the HOF rules were established, THE POST SEASON WAS
MUCH SHORTER THAN IT IS TODAY. THESE RULES WOULD'VE BEEN CHANGED TO REFLECT CURRENT
REALITY IF ENOUGH ETHICAL VOTERS REMAINED, HADN'T RESIGNED IN DISGUST, ETC.
Stumbleupon
StumbleUpon