ESPN Ombudsman's latest--still sees opinion over fact
ESPN will probably never get another ombudsman as good as their current one. Her latest report, 5/15/08, details positives before relating everything else. She again references ESPN's preference for opinion as opposed to objectivity. Most people in sports info-circles who aren't already employed there in some way will be so eventually (as Ms. Schreiber said in an earlier report, 4/5/07). Or certainly hope to be if they're interested in money. Sports has one voice. Why not?
- (ESPN ombudsman Schreiber, 5/15/08): "...I sometimes entertain the giddy hope it heralds the beginning of the end of opinion's dominance at ESPN. In my headier moments, I even imagine a cable universe that realizes the blogosphere provides all the outlets anyone could want for the venting of both informed and uninformed opinion, and that
- "There are a lot of prices to pay for opinion-driven sports journalism --
- ...All I can say for sure is that factuality has been devalued in 24/7 sports media. If you look at the proportion of airtime and cyberspace devoted to reporting fact versus delivering opinion on ESPN, ESPN.com and ESPN Radio, it is clear that the main function of sports news is to serve as the molehill on which mountains of opinion are built. We don't have news cycles anymore. We have opinion cycles."
- via Neil Best's Watchdog blog.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home