The Mitchell Report does not state what NY Times implies--sorry
DON'T TAKE THEIR CALLS, JOE TORRE. If A LIE is repteated OFTEN ENOUGH, PEOPLE START BELIEVING IT'S TRUE AND IT'S NOT.
- NY Times, Murray Chass: "Now, however, it develops that the Yankees’ 2000 team was loaded with players who used performance-enhancing drugs before, during or after that season."
- There's a picture of Chuck Knoblauch along with this article saying he's been linked to usage while in the Bronx. What it doesn't say is his usage wasn't until after 2000, according to the Report. But there's his picture along with this article about the 2000 tainted team.
- THE MITCHELL REPORT DOES NOT SAY NEAGLE USED HGH IN THE LATTER HALF OF 2000 AS CHASS IMPLIES HERE. IT SAYS HE PLAYED FOR THE YANKEES, HE SUBSEQUENTLY MET RADOMSKI AT A CLUB, AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE HE BECAME A CLIENT AND ALWAYS PAID BY CHECK. THE PHOTOCOPIES OF ALL THE CHECKS ARE IN THE APPENDIX OF THE MITCHELL REPORT ON PP389 AND 390 FROM NEAGLE AND NONE ARE WRITTEN BEFORE 2001. FIRST YOU SAY WE'RE SUPPOSED TO BELIEVE THE REPORT, THEN YOU SAY WE'RE SUPPOSED TO ADD OUR OWN IMAGINATION TO IT.
- Reference NY Times article by Murray Chass, "Does Yankee Steroid Use Indirectly Taint Torre?" 12/23/07
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home