How traditional journalism completely missed the Scott Brown election and was saved at the last minute by Rasmussen
Pew: "And when it became clear something was up,
- it was polling—
- Then came a crucial moment. A poll by Rasmussen Reports published on January 5 showed that Brown trailed Coakley by single digits, only 9 points, a much closer race than previously thought. The Herald quoted Rasmussen President Scott Rasmussen saying,
- The media, even locally, were utterly surprised by the support for Scott Brown." (Both the Globe and Herald had endorsed Coakley)
- In the two weeks after the Rasmussen poll, coverage picked up frantically. The New York Times and Associated Press produced almost twice as many stories in final the two weeks from January 6-19 as they did in the entire three months from September 1-December 8. Locally, nearly one-quarter of all the Boston Globe’s election coverage occurred in the final two weeks. Herald coverage accelerated further, with nearly 40% of all its campaign stories published in that period....
- One other framing finding during the primary suggests this was not a campaign marked
- by much journalistic
- vetting of candidates’ claims,
- accounted for 1% of the stories examined." ...
Labels: How media missed the Scott Brown election story
Tweet Stumbleupon StumbleUpon
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home