Monday, March 23, 2009

Washington Post corrections procedures lax, Ombud

Metro pages have worst record.

The newspaper's process for handling correction requests has not worked properly. In some instances,

  • reporters were never even notified that readers had requested corrections to their stories.

There is little statistical analysis to spot trends in errors or to detect reporters (or editors) with high correction rates. As the saying goes, what gets measured gets fixed.

  • Reporters and editors can neglect correction requests with little real consequence.

The Post's top editors are aware of the problem. Since being named one of The Post's two managing editors in mid-January, Raju Narisetti has focused on what he acknowledges is a serious problem.

  • "Some of the requests -- whether meriting a correction or not -- have simply fallen through the cracks between reporters and editors and the system we use to track such requests," he says. "And we don't have a system for pushing for closure."

Mistakes are inevitable in daily journalism, and The Post runs plenty of corrections -- roughly

but some parts of the paper -- the obituary and editorial pages, for instance -- carry their own corrections....The system has broken down most frequently with The Post's sprawling Metro desk, which covers Maryland, Virginia, the District and obituaries....

Currently, policies at washingtonpost.com mainly address corrections for print stories that appear on the Web site."...by Andrew Alexander, Ombudsman, "A Corrections Process in Need of Correcting" via Poynter.org/Romenesko

  • What a surprise. sm
Related memo posted on Romenesko

Stumbleupon StumbleUpon


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home