Don't forget Pacifica Radio's 150 outlets, to do so would be unfair
- ""Freedom of the press belongs to the man who owns one." A. J. Liebling
The way the leftists and liberals go on about conservative talk radio, what they call our "megaphones," one would suspect that they had a bad case of megaphone envy. They make it sound that somehow
- conservatives and their capitalist lackeys have created a monopoly over the radio spectrum, cutting off and
- drowning out the left's political points of view
- that otherwise would surely prevail in the court of public opinion,
- if only the "People" had the chance to hear them.
The premier owner of progressive radio stations in the US is the Pacifica Foundation. Founded in 1949 in Berkeley, California with the
- explicit intent of spreading a pacifist message through radio broadcasting,
- today the organization holds Federal Communications Commission (FCC) licenses for powerful FM transmitters
- in the San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles, Houston, Washington, D.C. and New York City. In addition, they claim almost 150 affiliate stations that re-broadcast their content in other US markets.
A reasonable analysis of the situation in the five metropolitan market areas with Pacifica transmitters shows that
- government licensure has offered Pacifica Foundation stations full technical equivalency to the local stations that carry the prototypical conservative talk show personality, Rush Limbaugh.
Metro Market
| Pacifica
| Limbaugh
| ||
San Francisco
| 4
| |||
Los Angeles
| 2
| KFI*
| ||
Houston
| 6
| |||
Washington, D.C.
| 9
| |||
New York City
| 1
| WABC*
|
* A clear channel on AM
An inspection of the two maps in any specific market shows that the Pacifica licenses pretty much cover their metropolitan areas and hence the core population about as well as the Limbaugh stations. The Limbaugh stations do have a bit further reach into the lower population density hinterlands, especially the two powerful clear channel AM stations, known to the industry as "blowtorches."
- This is to some degree the result of a technological choice on the part of Pacifica Foundation.
- It opted for the superior broadcast sound quality of FM.
- So who has the bigger, more powerful megaphone, as granted by the US Federal Communications Commission, at least in these five major metropolitan markets? I'd call it a pretty much a wash but you can judge for yourself by comparing hyperlinked maps.
- In addition they pay taxes.
- They pay property taxes and employment taxes and inventory taxes, ad nauseum.
- Clear Channel Communications, in 2006 (before it went private and stopped filing 10K reports) paid over half a billion dollars in income taxes at a rate of almost 30% of net income.
On the other hand, Pacifica Foundation, as a recognized non-profit, made no profit and paid no income taxes.
So here is a progressive network of five stations, subsidized with taxpayer cash partially covering operating expenses, broadcasting over extremely valuable radio spectra in major US markets
- In fact, Pacifica is subsidized by government.
But that's just the direct payments. As Professor Arthur Brooks, of Syracuse University, reminds us, the
Another matter is the value of the licenses that Pacifica Foundation holds as a gift from the federal government. These are valuable pieces of paper, if not fully tangible property in the legal or accounting sense. They are issued and re-issued by the FCC for terms of 6 years.... Barring malfeasance, public challenge, political interference, or gross disregard of FCC regulations,
- contributions of the listeners are indirectly subsidized by their ability to
- deduct charitable contributions from their taxable income.
- Plus, given the highly political content broadcast over Pacifica stations,
- are they really a charitable organization?
- re-issuance is routine.
- As a non-profit entity, Pacifica has neither to calculate nor report the value of its five licenses.
- Today, all five licenses could fetch upwards of $250,000,000 per Mr. Garland's estimation.
- Yet, Pacifica need not report these holdings
- nor pay taxes on the appreciation.
- as a gift from the US government.
- Let's compare just how many citizens take the opportunity for progressive content against how many citizens chose the stations with conservative talk programming.
The dominant company in radio ratings is Arbitron, which uses a special device called a "Portable People Monitor" which is carried by randomly selected adults and teens on their persons.... It is still a relatively new technique but it seems more accurate than the hand-written diary methods used previously.
- ...A relative simple metric called "share" (page 38) tells the story. Of all the time spent listening to radio in a market, what percentage of the total radio listening is to the rated station? The standard parameters for this data are persons 12 and over, between the hours of 6 AM and 12 midnight, over the seven day week. A station with a share of 2% gets twice as much of listening time (in people-hours) as a station with a 1% share. Almost all stations participate.
- In just the Washington D.C market, 9th size in the nation and the smallest with a Pacifica station, there are
- 43 competing stations dividing the 100% of the radio listening amongst them....
The one Pacifica station that seems to be a competitive outlier is WPFW in Washington D.C. It is listed as a "jazz" format and has more music compared to the other Pacifica stations with 11 of the 18 weekday hours of the survey devoted to music. Of course, Washington is a company town and conservative talk radio is not exactly big-government friendly -- WMAL is relatively low rated amongst the conservative stations.
- The facts show that progressive radio has more than a fair chance to reach a radio audience but
- listeners just aren't tuning in.
In New York City, hardly a bastion of knuckle-dragging rednecks,
Of course, Pacifica might not be the only progressive broadcaster in these markets but then there are other conservative talk radio broadcasters who don't carry Rush Limbaugh....
With 50 FM frequencies, over 100 AM frequencies theoretically available to a listener, if only someone would only pay the costs of filling them, over 300 satellite channels, and an untold number of internet radio stations, one can ask,
- why does any one channel with a single set of managers and program developers
- have to overcome their own worldviews and strive for balance within that station's broadcasts? ...
- *Mr. Somsel in comments: "I could have added a couple more facts -
- besides Pacifica's 150+ stations,
- NPR has over 1,000 stations. Limbaugh is on 600." via Radio Daily News
Labels: Local radio and fairness
Tweet Stumbleupon StumbleUpon
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home