XM MLB Chat

Tuesday, December 02, 2008

Politically correct coverage of Mumbai torture and massacre by the NY Times

"In a series of six alleged “news” stories on the Mumbai massacre, from November 27 to December 1, The New York Times... refused to call the terrorists Muslims or Islamic extremists.

The killers were variously described as “terrorists,” “gunmen,” “militants’ and “assailants,” but never Muslims. The only time readers could catch a glimpse of the terrorists’ motivation was when the paper quoted them directly - as when they complained about the treatment of Muslims in India and the Kashmir

The Times adamantly refuses to recognize a connection between Islam and worldwide terrorism, even though most terrorist acts are committed by Muslims,

Collectively, this constitutes the greatest denial of reality in the history of journalism."... via MichaelSavage.com

"Mumbai: Deadly Media Euphemisms," Cooper, Brackman, NY Post It's difficult for Indian citizens to purchase their own firearms. All slaughtered in Mumbai were unarmed. Addendum, 12/5/08: " "The victims were strangled," said Rakesh Maria, a senior Mumbai police official. "There were injuries noticed on the bodies that were not from firing.""...from The Australian, "Torture Signs on Mumbai Jews"
  • His back is bruised where terrorists hit him." from CBS News, "Hero Nanny Saved Baby Amid Mumbai Horror," 12/5/08

Stumbleupon StumbleUpon

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home