The AP could act like an actual news outlet by telling the facts about the 'new' Arizona law instead of taking sides against the people

The AP makes a dramatic portrayal in a caption, says the Arizona law is controversial, MLB is at risk, etc. Not true. The Arizona law uses the same wording as existing federal law...which is not being enforced? And that the worst that will happen to anyone is they will be asked for ID. End of story.

• The AP neglects to say that large sections of Arizona have been permanently closed since 2006 due to uncontrollable illegal alien violence which is getting worse. The map below shows the land already lost due to Mexican violence the US cannot control. Is the AP in favor of criminals taking over Arizona and the US? Is it not suicidal to be focusing on ID cards instead of real danger? Even Arianna Huffington knows the bottom line.

6/23, AP, "State Sen. Gil Cedillo, D-Los Angeles, center, discusses his proposed resolution calling on California to begin an economic boycott of Arizona over its controversial immigration law, at the Capitol in Sacramento, Calif., Wednesday, June 23, 2010. More than 40 lawmakers have signed on as co-authors of Cedillo's resolution that opposes

• the Arizona law requiring law enforcement officers to check the citizenship of

anyone they believe might be in the country illegally."... (This is not accurate!)

• (continuing, AP): "If approved, the resolution would call on the state to issue a travel advisory, cease California investments in Arizona and

urge Major League Baseball to reconsider having Arizona host the 2011 All-Star Game."

• AP sides with the government against the people in their sad description here. ed.

6/22: Jon Voight to Obama:

• "You have brought to Arizona a civil war."

• Arizona border, 3/16/09, from Now Public

Tweet Stumbleupon StumbleUpon