In the afternoon, he took to the radio, telling WFAN, “I don’t have a
chance” in the hearing and denying that he had used
performance-enhancing drugs in recent years.
The tipping point for Rodriguez apparently came in the morning when the
arbitrator hearing his case, Fredric Horowitz, would not order Bud
Selig, the commissioner of baseball, to testify in the proceedings. “The
absurdity and injustice just became too much,” Rodriguez said in a
statement. “I walked out and will not participate any further in this
farce.”...
On WFAN, Rodriguez said he never imagined that Selig would not take the
stand, adding: “This should end with Selig on Thursday and me on Friday
under oath. Put your money where your mouth is.”
On the ruling, the players association said in a statement: “The
M.L.B.P.A. believes that every player has the right under our
arbitration process to directly confront his accuser. We argued
strenuously to the arbitrator in Alex’s case that the commissioner
should be required to appear and testify. While we respectfully disagree
with the arbitrator’s ruling, we will abide by it as we continue to
vigorously challenge Alex’s suspension within the context of this
hearing.”
Rodriguez has admitted to using performance-enhancing drugs from 2001 to
2003, while with the Texas Rangers. The WFAN radio interview Wednesday
included repeated denials from Rodriguez that he had used P.E.D.'s in
recent years, and he said he should not be suspended at all, never mind
211 games. “I feel like I should be there opening day, and that’s what
I’m working hard for,” he said.
While it was unclear what direct impact Rodriguez’s walkout would have
on his appeal, some legal experts said Horowitz was unlikely to take
kindly to Rodriguez’s actions during the proceedings and his subsequent
public statement condemning the Selig decision.
“You don’t attack the tribunal or individual who is making a decision in
your case unless you feel that all is lost,” said William B. Gould IV, a
former chairman of the National Labor Relations Board, who teaches
labor and sports law at Stanford. “Even then, it isn’t the wisest thing
to do.”
Gould added, “I’ve been a student of baseball arbitration for years, and I don’t recall anything akin to this one.”
With Rodriguez and his lawyers believing that arbitration seems futile,
they have laid the groundwork to try the case in the courts. In October,
Rodriguez sued M.L.B. and Selig in New York court, claiming they engaged in a “witch hunt” to push Rodriguez out of baseball. The case is pending.
Joseph Farelli, a labor lawyer, said it was apparent that Rodriguez’s
lawyers were trying to build a case that the arbitration has been
unfair, which could be important to the pending litigation. “They are
trying to lay the groundwork to get a ruling overturned,” Farelli said."
============================
11/20/13, "Mike Francesa on Alex Rodriguez interview: I asked him all the tough questions," Newsday, Neil Best. image above from YES Network which televises Yankee games and simulcasts Mike Francesa's WFAN radio show
============================
11/20/13, "Mike Francesa on Alex Rodriguez interview: I asked him all the tough questions," Newsday, Neil Best. image above from YES Network which televises Yankee games and simulcasts Mike Francesa's WFAN radio show
No comments:
Post a Comment