XM MLB Chat: Shakedown: White House used UN Thug IPCC data on CO2 without checking. Did Supreme Court do the same?

Which is fine, because it isn't about the planet. It's about transferring hundreds of billions per year from US taxpayers to thugs around the world.

US Senator Inhofe: "Lisa Jackson, Obama's EPA Administrator, admitted to me publicly that EPA based its action today in good measure on the findings

of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC. She told me that EPA accepted those findings
without any serious, independent analysis to see whether they were true.

Of course, we now have thousands of emails showing several of the UN's top scientists apparently evading laws requiring transparency, defaming scientists with opposing viewpoints, and manipulating data to fit preconceived opinions. They cooked the science.

For example, some of the scientists involved worked to exclude inconvenient facts -- most notably the fact that

there has been no global warming since 1998.

The scandal, which has come to be known as "climategate," has rocked the scientific community. The Atlantic Monthly said,

"The stink of intellectual corruption is overpowering."

And the U.K. Telegraph said, "This is the worst scientific scandal of our generation."

The UN is investigating it; leading academic and scientific institutions are investigating it; and I am investigating it. Yet, Democratic leaders in Congress and the Obama Administration have dismissed it. I agree with Sen. Joe Lieberman, who said of climategate, "We ought to be demanding that that be cleaned up. We ought to be angry about it."

The endangerment finding also will have virtually no impact on global warming. That's because India and China, two of the world's leading emitters of CO2, are left out. Of course, next week President Obama will try to spin "commitments" from India and China to address their emissions --
yet these commitments will be effectively meaningless.

So, our jobs and our emissions will move to countries that have few if any environmental requirements. Don't take my word for it; just ask

EPA Administrator Jackson, who said

"U.S. action alone will not impact world CO2 levels.""...

That's right, because this isn't about saving the planet. It's about getting up to $400 billion per year, every year, from US taxpayers to unnamed sleazebags around the world. Such demands are in news reports every day.